Two types of electromagnetic-field fluctuations affect the Casimir-Polder force in opposite ways. Heating a glass plate increases the surface’s attractive force. Electromagnetic waves from the surroundings enhance the surface’s repulsive force. The two forces nearly cancel each other out if the plate and surroundings are at the same temperature.
Credit: Greg Kuebler
The key to their success was doubling the temperature of a glass plate while keeping the plate’s surroundings near room temperature. The researchers accomplished this by using a laser to selectively heat the fused silica surface. This strategy allowed the researchers to experimentally measure one of two thermal processes that contribute to the Casimir-Polder force. These processes have opposing effects on the size of the force.

Colored curves show that raising the temperature of a glass
surface increases the strength of the Casimir-Polder force.
Credit: John Obrecht & Greg Kuebler
When the laser heated the silica surface, it increased the electromagnetic waves inside the plate, which mostly remained inside the glass. However, a few evanescent electromagnetic waves leaked out through the surface and strengthened its attractive force. This attractive surface force enhanced the Casimir-Polder force emanating from the free space surrounding the plate. It is also what made the “warm glass stickier than the cold glass,” according to Cornell.
However, if the temperature of the rest of the apparatus had also been doubled, more electromagnetic waves from the surroundings would have reflected off the surface. These reflected waves would have created a repulsive force at the plate’s surface, which would have nearly cancelled the attraction due to the glass’s thermal force. The figure here shows the two types of electromagnetic-field fluctuations that drive the Casimir-Polder force.
The Cornell group’s new understanding of the temperature dependence of the Casimir-Polder force may help engineers design better atom chips, nanomachines, MEMS, and NEMS.—Julie Phillips
Reference:
J. M. Obrecht, R. J. Wild, M. Antezza, S. Stringari, and E. A. Cornell, Physical Review Letters, 98, 063201 (2007).